The Obligatory Thesis Reading Post

I haven’t posted anything here and that’s my fault (I chronically seem to have no concept of time), so I’ll pretend to be productive and post what I have so far of my Master’s thesis list (and I probably missed several articles). I’m tentatively going to be writing in the realm of disability (blindness, primarily), early moderns, and John Milton (mostly regarding Samson Agonistes). 

  1. Blindness: The History of a Mental Image in Western Thought, Moshe Barasch.
  2. Performing Blindness: Representing Disability in early modern Popular Performance and Print, Simone Chess (in Recovering Disability in Early Modern England, Hobgood & Wood).
  3. Vanities of the Eye, Stuart Clark.
  4. Bending Over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism, and Other Difficult Positions, Lennard Davis.
  5. Constructing Normalcy,Lennard Davis (in Disability studies reader).
  6. Disability Studies Reader, Lennard Davis (editor).
  7. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body, Lennard Davis.
  8. Disability in the Middle Ages: Reconsiderations and Reverberations, Joshua Eyler (editor).
  9. The Vanitie of the Eye, George Hakewill.
  10. Caesar Hath the Falling Sickness: The Legibility of Early Modern Disability in Shakespearean Drama, Allison P. Hobgood.
  11. Ethical Staring, Disabling the English Renaissance, Allison P. Hobgood and David Houston Wood (in Recovering Disability).
  12. Recovering Disability in Early Modern England, Allison P. Hobgood and David Houston Wood (editors).
  13. Samson Agonistes, John Milton.
  14. Paradise Lost, John Milton.
  15. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse, David T. Mitchell and Sharon L. Snyder
  16. Disability Aesthetics, Tobin Siebers.
  17. Time, Narrative, and Emotion in Early Modern England, David Houston Wood.

I’ve read several on the list already and will probably post thoughts later. As a general side note, disability studies has been really compelling for me as someone who both identifies as chronically ill and is in the process of diagnosis for a genetic condition (there are very strong indications of either Ehlers Danlos Syndrome or a Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder). I can’t seem to look at the standard medical rhetoric used for this condition and medical rhetoric in general quite the same way now. But more on that later.

Next post: definitely will be about potential interests of where I want to go with it, because there are a lot of things jumping out at me even this early on. I could not be more thrilled with what I’m doing.